Call us: +44 870 8 200 310
Or write: experts@regartis.com
Monitor substances in REACH with EcoMole Watchdog.
The classification system for mixtures covers all classification categories which are used for substances, i.e. categories Acute 1 and Chronic 1 to 4. In order to make use of all available data for purposes of classifying the aquatic environmental hazards of the mixture, the following is applied where appropriate:
The ‘relevant components’ of a mixture are those which are classified ‘Acute 1’or ‘Chronic 1’ and present in a concentration of 0,1 % (w/w) or greater, and those which are classified ‘Chronic 2’, ‘Chronic 3’ or ‘Chronic 4’ and present in a concentration of 1 % (w/w) or greater, unless there is a presumption (such as in the case of highly toxic components (see section 4.1.3.5.5.5)) that a component present in a lower concentration can still be relevant for classifying the mixture for aquatic environmental hazards. Generally, for substances classified as ‘Acute 1’ or ‘Chronic 1’ the concentration to be taken into account is (0,1/M) %. (For explanation M-factor see section 4.1.3.5.5.5.)
The approach for classification of aquatic environmental hazards is tiered, and is dependent upon the type of information available for the mixture itself and for its components. Figure 4.1.2 outlines the process to be followed.
Elements of the tiered approach include:
— classification based on tested mixtures,
— classification based on bridging principles,
— the use of ‘summation of classified components’ and/or an ‘additivity formula’.
Figure 4.1.2
Tiered approach to classification of mixtures for short-term (acute) and long-term (chronic) aquatic environmental hazards
4.1.3.3.1. |
When the mixture as a whole has been tested to determine its aquatic toxicity, this information can be used for classifying the mixture according to the criteria that have been agreed for substances. The classification is normally based on the data for fish, crustacea and algae/plants (see sections 4.1.2.7.1 and 4.1.2.7.2). When adequate acute or chronic toxicity data for the mixture as a whole are lacking, ‘bridging principles’ or ‘summation method’ should be applied (see sections 4.1.3.4 and 4.1.3.5). |
4.1.3.3.2. |
►M12 The long-term (chronic) hazard classification of mixtures requires additional information on degradability and in certain cases bioaccumulation. ◄ Degradability and bioaccumulation tests for mixtures are not used as they are usually difficult to interpret, and such tests may be meaningful only for single substances. |
4.1.3.3.3. |
Classification for category Acute 1 (a) When there are adequate acute toxicity test data (LC50 or EC50) available for the mixture as a whole showing L(E)C50 ≤ 1 mg/l: Classify mixture as Acute 1 in accordance with point (a) of Table 4.1.0. (b) When there are acute toxicity test data (LC50(s) or EC50(s)) available for the mixture as a whole showing L(E)C50(s) > 1 mg/l for normally all trophic levels: No need to classify for short-term (acute) hazard. |
4.1.3.3.4. |
Classification for categories Chronic 1, 2 and 3 (a) When there are adequate chronic toxicity data (ECxx or NOEC) available for the mixture as a whole showing ECx or NOEC of the tested mixture ≤ 1mg/l: (i) Classify the mixture as Chronic 1, 2 or 3 in accordance with point (b)(ii) of Table 4.1.0 as rapidly degradable if the available information allows the conclusion that all relevant components of the mixture are rapidly degradable; (ii) Classify the mixture as Chronic 1 or 2 in all other cases in accordance with point (b)(i) of Table 4.1.0 as non-rapidly degradable; (b) When there are adequate chronic toxicity data (ECx or NOEC) available for the mixture as a whole showing ECx(s) or NOEC(s) of the tested mixture > 1 mg/l for normally all trophic levels: No need to classify for long-term (chronic) hazard in categories Chronic 1, 2 or 3. |
4.1.3.3.5. |
Classification for category Chronic 4 If there are nevertheless reasons for concern: Classify the mixture as Chronic 4 (safety net classification) in accordance with Table 4.1.0. |
4.1.3.4.1. |
Where the mixture itself has not been tested to determine its aquatic environmental hazard, but there are sufficient data on the individual components and similar tested mixtures to adequately characterise the hazards of the mixture, this data shall be used in accordance with the bridging rules set out in section 1.1.3. However, in relation to application of the bridging rule for dilution, sections 4.1.3.4.2 and 4.1.3.4.3 shall be used. |
4.1.3.4.2. |
Dilution: if a mixture is formed by diluting another tested mixture or a substance classified for its aquatic environmental hazard with a diluent which has an equivalent or lower aquatic hazard classification than the least toxic original component and which is not expected to affect the aquatic hazards of other components, then the resulting mixture may be classified as equivalent to the original tested mixture or substance. Alternatively, the method explained in section 4.1.3.5 may be applied. |
4.1.3.4.3. |
If a mixture is formed by diluting another tested mixture or substance with water or other totally non-toxic material, the toxicity of the mixture can be calculated from the original mixture or substance. |
4.1.3.5.1. |
The classification of a mixture is based on summation of the concentration of its classified components. The percentage of components classified as ‘Acute’ or ‘Chronic’ is fed straight in to the summation method. Details of the summation method are described in section 4.1.3.5.5. |
4.1.3.5.2. |
Mixtures can be made of a combination of both components that are classified (as Acute 1 and/or Chronic 1, 2, 3, 4) and others for which adequate toxicity test data is available. When adequate toxicity data are available for more than one component in the mixture, the combined toxicity of those components is calculated using the following additivity formulas (a) or (b), depending on the nature of the toxicity data: (a) Based on acute aquatic toxicity:
where:
The calculated toxicity may be used to assign that portion of the mixture a short-term (acute) hazard category which is then subsequently used in applying the summation method; (b) Based on chronic aquatic toxicity:
where:
The equivalent toxicity thus reflects the fact that non-rapidly degrading substances are classified one hazard category level more ‘severe’ than rapidly degrading substances. The calculated equivalent toxicity may be used to assign that portion of the mixture a long-term (chronic) hazard category, in accordance with the criteria for rapidly degradable substances (point (b)(ii) of Table 4.1.0), which is then subsequently used in applying the summation method. |
4.1.3.5.3. |
When applying the additivity formula for part of the mixture, it is preferable to calculate the toxicity of this part of the mixture using for each substance toxicity values that relate to the same taxonomic group (i.e. fish, crustacean, algae or equivalent) and then to use the highest toxicity (lowest value) obtained (i.e. use the most sensitive of the three taxonomic groups). However, when toxicity data for each component are not available in the same taxonomic group, the toxicity value of each component is selected in the same manner that toxicity values are selected for the classification of substances, i.e. the higher toxicity (from the most sensitive test organism) is used. The calculated acute and chronic toxicity is then used to assess whether this part of the mixture shall be classified as Acute 1 and/or Chronic 1, 2 or 3 using the same criteria described for substances. |
4.1.3.5.4. |
If a mixture is classified in more than one way, the method yielding the more conservative result shall be used. |
4.1.3.5.5. |
Summation method 4.1.3.5.5.1. Rationale
4.1.3.5.5.2. Classification procedure
4.1.3.5.5.3. Classification for category Acute 1
4.1.3.5.5.4. Classification for the categories Chronic 1, 2, 3 and 4
4.1.3.5.5.5. Mixtures with highly toxic components
|
4.1.3.6.1. |
►M12 In the event that no useable information on short-term (acute) and/or long-term (chronic) aquatic hazard is available for one or more relevant components, it is concluded that the mixture cannot be attributed to one or more definitive hazard category(ies). ◄ In this situation the mixture shall be classified based on the known components only, with the additional statement on the label and in the SDS that: ‘Contains x % of components with unknown hazards to the aquatic environment’. |